On 26/07/2019 09:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-07-24 12:11:54)
On 23/07/2019 19:38, Chris Wilson wrote:
Push the ring creation flags from the outer GEM context to the inner
intel_cotnext to avoid an unsightly back-reference from inside the
backend.
Sorry I find this quite ugly. Passing in integers in pointers filed and
casting back and forth.
But better than a union, since once the intel_context is active, the
ring is always a ring.
Unless it is u64 size. I am not buying it. :)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 6d3911469801..e237bcecfa1f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -328,10 +328,14 @@ static void print_context_stats(struct seq_file *m,
for_each_gem_engine(ce,
i915_gem_context_lock_engines(ctx), it) {
- if (ce->state)
- per_file_stats(0, ce->state->obj, &kstats);
- if (ce->ring)
+ intel_context_lock_pinned(ce);
+ if (intel_context_is_pinned(ce)) {
And these hunks do not seem to belong to this patch.
Then you are mistaken. The bug is older, but it gets triggered by this
patch.
Gets triggered or gets fixed? Perhaps commit message needs improving
since it talks about avoiding an unsightly back-reference (and I argue
ce->ring = u64 size is at least equally unsightly), and not fixing any bugs.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx