On 28/07/2019 10:23, Chris Wilson wrote:
If the legacy ringbuffer doesn't support scheduling, it doesn't set the cap! Hypothetically if one were to enable ringbuffer scheduling, this is part of its testing suite. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c index 7b4186228..4ccacba41 100644 --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c @@ -1774,9 +1774,6 @@ igt_main igt_fixture { igt_require(gem_scheduler_enabled(fd)); igt_require(gem_scheduler_has_ctx_priority(fd)); - - /* need separate rings */ - igt_require(gem_has_execlists(fd)); }for (e = intel_execution_engines; e->name; e++) {
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Regards, Tvrtko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
