Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-07-26 10:22:08) > > On 23/07/2019 19:38, Chris Wilson wrote: > I read it, relatively rushed, since pressure keeps getting applied! :/ > > There are some good parts and implementation looks okay, but I am not > sure we need a tree. Nodes are bigger than pointers, management code is > bigger, lookup is slower.. is it a win all things considered? A big win imo. Consider that this interface is purely debug, the primary interface runtime will be via gt->engines, the nodes are much smaller than the sparse array. I am adamant that we are not adding more sparse arrays. A 2D lookup table since that matches the HW, but even then we may just end up with LUT (1 extra pointer load to replace the sparse array with a compact?) -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
