Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-07-23 00:20:41) > We have several HAS_* checks for GuC and HuC but we mostly use HAS_GUC > and HAS_HUC, with only 1 exception. Since our HW always has either > both uC or neither of them, just replace all the checks with a unified > HAS_UC. > > Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx> Given that we only had a single .has_[hg]uc entry, calling that .has_uc makes sense. I trust in your crystal ball that not being able to distinguish between the availability of different uC is not important. Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx