Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-07-22 13:16:38)
>
> On 18/07/2019 13:42, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > As our global unpark/park keep track of the number of active users, we
> > can simply move the accounting from the GEM layer to the base GT layer.
> > It was placed originally inside GEM to benefit from the 100ms extra
> > delay on idleness, but that has been eliminated and now there is no
> > substantive difference between the layers. In moving it, we move another
> > piece of the puzzle out from underneath struct_mutex.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pm.c | 4 ----
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pm.c
> > index 8faf262278ae..1afb04660725 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pm.c
> > @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
> > #include "gt/intel_gt_pm.h"
> >
> > #include "i915_drv.h"
> > -#include "i915_globals.h"
> >
> > static void call_idle_barriers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > {
> > @@ -41,8 +40,6 @@ static void i915_gem_park(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> >
> > intel_timelines_park(i915);
> > i915_vma_parked(i915);
> > -
> > - i915_globals_park();
>
> Benefit of this placement was also that what will be freed on parking
> was freed by this point so shrinking of slabs is effective. If you move
> it to gt parking then that runs to early. So I think it is better that
> it stays where it is.
But there's nothing here. You are imaging things. call_idle_barriers and
batch_pool are in engine_park, timelines_park is gone, and vma_parked is
now a timer.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
