Re: [PATCH v1 04/11] drm/ati_pcigart: drop dependency on drm_os_linux.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 08:11:35PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Sean.
> > 
> > Any plans for the other users of DRM_WRITE<N>()? It seems like it'd be trivial
> > to fix it up for via and mga. I don't really have any background on
> > drm_os_linux.h, but it doesn't seem like it'd be that much more effort to just
> > remove the whole thing.
> 
> During the drmP.h removal I also took care of drm_os_linux.h,
> so when the patches land then there will be no users left.
> I look forward to delete that file.
> 
> For via I only just posted the patches today.
> For mga they already landed in drm-misc-next.
> 

Awesome! I think I was looking at drm-next instead of -misc-next, so happy to
hear the future is bright :)

Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>


> I expect that we after next merge window can delete
> both drm_os_linux.h and drmP.h.
> 
> 	Sam

-- 
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux