On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:46:42AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Lucas De Marchi wrote:From: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx> Reuse Gen11 stolen memory changes since Tiger Lake uses the same BSM register (and format). Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c index 6c4f01540833..6f6b1d04dadf 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c @@ -549,6 +549,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_early_ids[] __initconst = { INTEL_CNL_IDS(&gen9_early_ops), INTEL_ICL_11_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), INTEL_EHL_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), + INTEL_TGL_12_IDS(&gen11_early_ops),How exactly is this supposed to build?
The define for this new platform is on drm-intel repository. For previous platforms we waited for an ack and merged through our tree. Is that ok? thanks Lucas De Marchi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
