On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 05:29:16PM +0000, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote:
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Navare, Manasi D
> >Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 10:24 AM
> >To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-
> >gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp/dsc: Add Support for all BPCs supported
> >by TGL
> >
> >On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 04:47:17PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 04:09:21PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> >> > DSC engine on ICL supports only 8 and 10 BPC as the input BPC. But
> >> > DSC engine in TGL supports 8, 10 and 12 BPC.
> >> > Add 12 BPC support for DSC while calculating compression
> >> > configuration.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 9 +++++++--
> >> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >> > index 0bdb7ecc5a81..cd089643c80d 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >> > @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
> >> > #define DP_DSC_MAX_SMALL_JOINER_RAM_BUFFER 61440
> >> > #define DP_DSC_MIN_SUPPORTED_BPC 8
> >> > #define DP_DSC_MAX_SUPPORTED_BPC 10
> >> > +#define TGL_DP_DSC_MAX_SUPPORTED_BPC 12
> >>
> >> These defines aren't doing any good IMO. I'd just nuke them.
> >
> >So just remove all the #defines and use the values directly?
>
> Wont it make it less readable?
It will be more readable because you don't have to go looking for those
defines.
>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > /* DP DSC throughput values used for slice count calculations KPixels/s */
> >> > #define DP_DSC_PEAK_PIXEL_RATE 2720000
> >> > @@ -1911,8 +1912,12 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct
> >intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> > if (!intel_dp_supports_dsc(intel_dp, pipe_config))
> >> > return -EINVAL;
> >> >
> >> > - dsc_max_bpc = min_t(u8, DP_DSC_MAX_SUPPORTED_BPC,
> >> > - conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> >> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) > 11)
> >>
> >> More customarily >= 12
> >
> >I agree
>
> Makes sense.
>
> Anusha
> >Manasi
> >
> >>
> >> > + dsc_max_bpc = min_t(u8, TGL_DP_DSC_MAX_SUPPORTED_BPC,
> >> > + conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> >> > + else
> >> > + dsc_max_bpc = min_t(u8, DP_DSC_MAX_SUPPORTED_BPC,
> >> > + conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> >> >
> >> > pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(intel_dp, dsc_max_bpc);
> >> > if (pipe_bpp < DP_DSC_MIN_SUPPORTED_BPC * 3) {
> >> > --
> >> > 2.21.0
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> >> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ville Syrjälä
> >> Intel
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Intel-gfx mailing list
> >> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
