On 07/10, Ser, Simon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patch! Here are a few comments.
>
> For bonus points, it would be nice to add igt_describe descriptions of
> each sub-test.
Hi Simon,
First of all, thanks for your feedback; I already applied most of your
suggestions. I just have some inline comments/questions.
> On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 23:16 -0300, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > Add tests for the WRITEBACK_PIXEL_FORMATS, WRITEBACK_OUT_FENCE_PTR and
> > WRITEBACK_FB_ID properties on writeback connectors, ensuring their
> > behaviour is correct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@xxxxxxx>
> > [rebased and updated do_writeback_test() function to address feedback]
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tests/Makefile.sources | 1 +
> > tests/kms_writeback.c | 314 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/meson.build | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 316 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 tests/kms_writeback.c
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/Makefile.sources b/tests/Makefile.sources
> > index 027ed82f..03cc8efa 100644
> > --- a/tests/Makefile.sources
> > +++ b/tests/Makefile.sources
> > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ TESTS_progs = \
> > kms_universal_plane \
> > kms_vblank \
> > kms_vrr \
> > + kms_writeback \
> > meta_test \
> > perf \
> > perf_pmu \
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_writeback.c b/tests/kms_writeback.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..66ef48a6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/kms_writeback.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
> > +/*
> > + * (C) COPYRIGHT 2017 ARM Limited. All rights reserved.
> > + *
> > + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
> > + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
> > + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
> > + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
> > + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> > + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> > + *
> > + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
> > + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
> > + * Software.
> > + *
> > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
> > + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
> > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
> > + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
> > + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> > + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
> > + * IN THE SOFTWARE.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <errno.h>
> > +#include <stdbool.h>
> > +#include <stdio.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> > +
> > +#include "igt.h"
> > +#include "igt_core.h"
> > +#include "igt_fb.h"
> > +
> > +static drmModePropertyBlobRes *get_writeback_formats_blob(igt_output_t *output)
> > +{
> > + drmModePropertyBlobRes *blob = NULL;
> > + uint64_t blob_id;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = kmstest_get_property(output->display->drm_fd,
> > + output->config.connector->connector_id,
> > + DRM_MODE_OBJECT_CONNECTOR,
> > + igt_connector_prop_names[IGT_CONNECTOR_WRITEBACK_PIXEL_FORMATS],
> > + NULL, &blob_id, NULL);
> > + if (ret)
> > + blob = drmModeGetPropertyBlob(output->display->drm_fd, blob_id);
> > +
> > + igt_assert(blob);
> > +
> > + return blob;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool check_writeback_config(igt_display_t *display, igt_output_t *output)
> > +{
> > + igt_fb_t input_fb, output_fb;
> > + igt_plane_t *plane;
> > + uint32_t writeback_format = DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
> > + uint64_t tiling = igt_fb_mod_to_tiling(0);
> > + int width, height, ret;
> > + drmModeModeInfo override_mode = {
> > + .clock = 25175,
> > + .hdisplay = 640,
> > + .hsync_start = 656,
> > + .hsync_end = 752,
> > + .htotal = 800,
> > + .hskew = 0,
> > + .vdisplay = 480,
> > + .vsync_start = 490,
> > + .vsync_end = 492,
> > + .vtotal = 525,
> > + .vscan = 0,
> > + .vrefresh = 60,
> > + .flags = DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC | DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC,
> > + .name = {"640x480-60"},
> > + };
> > + igt_output_override_mode(output, &override_mode);
> > +
> > + width = override_mode.hdisplay;
> > + height = override_mode.vdisplay;
> > +
> > + ret = igt_create_fb(display->drm_fd, width, height, DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888, tiling, &input_fb);
> > + igt_assert(ret >= 0);
> > +
> > + ret = igt_create_fb(display->drm_fd, width, height, writeback_format, tiling, &output_fb);
> > + igt_assert(ret >= 0);
> > +
> > + plane = igt_output_get_plane_type(output, DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY);
> > + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &input_fb);
> > + igt_output_set_writeback_fb(output, &output_fb);
> > +
> > + ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(display, DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY |
> > + DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET, NULL);
>
> Okay, we're using atomic test-only mode to know if we can perform tests
> with the writeback output. It's probably fine, but we don't use
> WRITEBACK_PIXEL_FORMATS, which makes me a little bit sad.
Sorry, I did not fully understand part. Did you expect to see something
like the below code before igt_display_try_commit_atomic()?
igt_output_set_prop_value(output, WRITEBACK_PIXEL_FORMATS,
DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888);
> > + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> > + igt_remove_fb(display->drm_fd, &input_fb);
> > + igt_remove_fb(display->drm_fd, &output_fb);
> > +
> > + return !ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static igt_output_t *kms_writeback_get_output(igt_display_t *display)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < display->n_outputs; i++) {
> > + igt_output_t *output = &display->outputs[i];
> > + int j;
> > +
> > + if (output->config.connector->connector_type != DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_WRITEBACK)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + kmstest_force_connector(display->drm_fd, output->config.connector, FORCE_CONNECTOR_ON);
>
> Hmm. Is this really necessary? "Real" userspace won't do this, so I
> don't think we need to either.
Hmmm, I have a little experience with userspace; however, I tested
kms_writeback on top of vkms without this line, and everything worked
well. If I remove this line, should I also drop the line that force
connector to FORCE_CONNECTOR_UNSPECIFIED?
Another question, if FORCE_CONNECTOR_ON is something that userspace
won't want to do, why do we have it?
> > + for (j = 0; j < igt_display_get_n_pipes(display); j++) {
> > + igt_output_set_pipe(output, j);
> > +
> > + if (check_writeback_config(display, output)) {
> > + igt_debug("Using connector %u:%s on pipe %d\n",
> > + output->config.connector->connector_id,
> > + output->name, j);
> > + return output;
> > + }
>
> We could probably add an igt_debug statement in case we don't use this
> writeback output.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Restore any connectors we don't use, so we don't trip on them later */
> > + kmstest_force_connector(display->drm_fd, output->config.connector, FORCE_CONNECTOR_UNSPECIFIED);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void check_writeback_fb_id(igt_output_t *output)
> > +{
> > + uint64_t check_fb_id;
> > +
> > + check_fb_id = igt_output_get_prop(output, IGT_CONNECTOR_WRITEBACK_FB_ID);
> > + igt_assert(check_fb_id == 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int do_writeback_test(igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags,
> > + uint32_t fb_id, int32_t *out_fence_ptr,
> > + bool ptr_valid)
>
> flags seems to always be set to DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET. We can
> probably remove the parameter from this function.
>
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + igt_display_t *display = output->display;
> > + struct kmstest_connector_config *config = &output->config;
> > +
> > + igt_output_set_prop_value(output, IGT_CONNECTOR_CRTC_ID, config->crtc->crtc_id);
> > + igt_output_set_prop_value(output, IGT_CONNECTOR_WRITEBACK_FB_ID, fb_id);
> > + igt_output_set_prop_value(output, IGT_CONNECTOR_WRITEBACK_OUT_FENCE_PTR, (uint64_t)out_fence_ptr);
> > +
> > + if (ptr_valid)
> > + *out_fence_ptr = 0;
> > +
> > + ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(display, flags, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (ptr_valid)
> > + igt_assert(*out_fence_ptr == -1);
>
> I'm confused. Why should this be -1 even if we
> igt_display_try_commit_atomic succeeds?
I inspected the drm_mode_atomic_ioctl() function and I noticed that It
calls complete_signaling() in its turn this function assign -1 to
out_fence_ptr. Since all of this happens at the end of atomic_commit, I
believe that we don’t need it. I already removed it.
> > + /* WRITEBACK_FB_ID must always read as zero */
> > + check_writeback_fb_id(output);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void invalid_out_fence(igt_output_t *output, igt_fb_t *valid_fb, igt_fb_t *invalid_fb)
> > +{
> > + int i, ret;
> > + int32_t out_fence;
> > + struct {
> > + uint32_t fb_id;
> > + bool ptr_valid;
> > + int32_t *out_fence_ptr;
> > + } invalid_tests[] = {
> > + {
> > + /* No output buffer, but the WRITEBACK_OUT_FENCE_PTR set. */
> > + .fb_id = 0,
> > + .ptr_valid = true,
> > + .out_fence_ptr = &out_fence,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + /* Invalid output buffer. */
> > + .fb_id = invalid_fb->fb_id,
> > + .ptr_valid = true,
> > + .out_fence_ptr = &out_fence,
> > + },
>
> This doesn't belong in this function (invalid_out_fence), since this
> checks an invalid framebuffer, not an invalid fence. We should probably
> move it to writeback_fb_id (and rename that function to test_fb?).
>
> > + {
> > + /* Invalid WRITEBACK_OUT_FENCE_PTR. */
> > + .fb_id = valid_fb->fb_id,
> > + .ptr_valid = false,
> > + .out_fence_ptr = (int32_t *)0x8,
> > + },
> > + };
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(invalid_tests); i++) {
> > + ret = do_writeback_test(output, DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET,
> > + invalid_tests[i].fb_id,
> > + invalid_tests[i].out_fence_ptr,
> > + invalid_tests[i].ptr_valid);
> > + igt_assert(ret != 0);
>
> Maybe we can check for -ret == EINVAL?
>
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void writeback_fb_id(igt_output_t *output, igt_fb_t *valid_fb, igt_fb_t *invalid_fb)
>
> invalid_fb doesn't seem to be used here. valid_fb seems to be set to
> the input framebuffer. It's probably not a good idea to use the same FB
> for input and writeback output.
>
> > +{
> > +
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* Valid output buffer */
> > + ret = do_writeback_test(output, DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET,
> > + valid_fb->fb_id, NULL, false);
> > + igt_assert(ret == 0);
> > +
> > + /* Invalid object for WRITEBACK_FB_ID */
> > + ret = do_writeback_test(output, DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET,
> > + output->id, NULL, false);
> > + igt_assert(ret == -EINVAL);
> > +
> > + /* Zero WRITEBACK_FB_ID */
> > + ret = do_writeback_test(output, DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET,
> > + 0, NULL, false);
> > + igt_assert(ret == 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +igt_main
> > +{
> > + igt_display_t display;
> > + igt_output_t *output;
> > + igt_plane_t *plane;
> > + igt_fb_t input_fb;
> > + drmModeModeInfo mode;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + memset(&display, 0, sizeof(display));
> > +
> > + igt_fixture {
> > + display.drm_fd = drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_ANY);
> > + igt_display_require(&display, display.drm_fd);
> > +
> > + kmstest_set_vt_graphics_mode();
> > +
> > + igt_display_require(&display, display.drm_fd);
> > +
> > + igt_require(display.is_atomic);
> > +
> > + output = kms_writeback_get_output(&display);
> > + igt_require(output);
> > +
> > + if (output->use_override_mode)
> > + memcpy(&mode, &output->override_mode, sizeof(mode));
> > + else
> > + memcpy(&mode, &output->config.default_mode, sizeof(mode));
> > +
> > + plane = igt_output_get_plane_type(output, DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY);
> > + igt_require(plane);
>
> Maybe we can assert on this?
>
> > + ret = igt_create_fb(display.drm_fd, mode.hdisplay,
> > + mode.vdisplay,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
> > + igt_fb_mod_to_tiling(0),
>
> This is supposed to take a modifier. DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR would be
> better to make this clear.
>
> (Applies to other lines of this patch)
>
> > + &input_fb);
> > + igt_assert(ret >= 0);
> > + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &input_fb);
> > + }
> > +
> > + igt_subtest("writeback-pixel-formats") {
> > + drmModePropertyBlobRes *formats_blob = get_writeback_formats_blob(output);
>
> Need to drmModeFreePropertyBlob this.
>
> > + const char *valid_chars = "0123456 ABCGNRUVXY";
> > + unsigned int i;
> > + char *c;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We don't have a comprehensive list of formats, so just check
> > + * that the blob length is sensible and that it doesn't contain
> > + * any outlandish characters
> > + */
> > + igt_assert(!(formats_blob->length % 4));
> > + c = formats_blob->data;
> > + for (i = 0; i < formats_blob->length; i++)
> > + igt_assert_f(strchr(valid_chars, c[i]),
> > + "Unexpected character %c\n", c[i]);
>
> Honestly, I'm not a fan of this check. There's no guarantee that fourcc
> codes will be made from ASCII characters, in fact some formats already
> have non-printable chars in them. I don't want to have to update this
> test when a new fourcc format is added.
>
> We currently don't have a test for IN_FORMATS. If we really want to
> check formats, we could have a big array of known formats and add a
> bool is_valid_format(uint32_t fmt) function.
Agree with you. How about remove this test?
Thanks
Best Regards
> > + }
> > +
> > + igt_subtest("writeback-invalid-out-fence") {
> > + igt_fb_t invalid_fb;
>
> invalid_output_fb would be a better name IMHO.
>
> > + ret = igt_create_fb(display.drm_fd, mode.hdisplay / 2,
> > + mode.vdisplay / 2,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
> > + igt_fb_mod_to_tiling(0),
> > + &invalid_fb);
> > + igt_require(ret > 0);
>
> We should probably use a different variable: ret is signed,
> igt_create_fb isn't. Also ret doesn't make it clear that the return
> value is the KMS framebuffer ID.
>
> (Applies to other subtests)
>
> > + invalid_out_fence(output, &input_fb, &invalid_fb);
>
> (Still not sure why we provide the input FB to this function.)
>
> > + igt_remove_fb(display.drm_fd, &invalid_fb);
> > + }
> > +
> > + igt_subtest("writeback-fb-id") {
> > + igt_fb_t output_fb;
> > + ret = igt_create_fb(display.drm_fd, mode.hdisplay, mode.vdisplay,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
> > + igt_fb_mod_to_tiling(0),
> > + &output_fb);
> > + igt_require(ret > 0);
> > +
> > + writeback_fb_id(output, &input_fb, &output_fb);
> > +
> > + igt_remove_fb(display.drm_fd, &output_fb);
> > + }
> > +
> > + igt_fixture {
> > + igt_remove_fb(display.drm_fd, &input_fb);
> > + igt_display_fini(&display);
> > + }
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build
> > index f168fbba..9c77cfcd 100644
> > --- a/tests/meson.build
> > +++ b/tests/meson.build
> > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ test_progs = [
> > 'kms_universal_plane',
> > 'kms_vblank',
> > 'kms_vrr',
> > + 'kms_writeback',
> > 'meta_test',
> > 'panfrost_get_param',
> > 'panfrost_gem_new',
> > _______________________________________________
> > igt-dev mailing list
> > igt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
--
Rodrigo Siqueira
https://siqueira.tech
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
