On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 12:49:21PM -0700, Jose Souza wrote:
FYI https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/316805/?series=62492&rev=7 Is just waiting CI feedback to get merged and it is doing the same job as this patch.
But that depends on the enum phy infra. Is that entering now?? This would means reworking the patches on this series as they are going to conflict badly. Lucas De Marchi
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 16:16 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:From: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> In GEN 12 PORT_C DDI clk_off bit is not equally distanced to A/B, it's at offset 24. Similarly TC port (5/6) clk off bits are at offset 22/23. Extend the macros to cover the additional ports. Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 5ca74eca05a4..4588df9e11de 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -9723,9 +9723,11 @@ enum skl_power_gate { #define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_ICL _MMIO(0x164280) #define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(port) (1 << ((port) == PORT_F ? 23 : \ (port) + 10)) -#define ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(port) (1 << ((port) + 10)) -#define ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_TC_CLK_OFF(tc_port) (1 << ((tc_port) == PORT_TC4 ? \ - 21 : (tc_port) + 12)) +#define ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(port) (1 << ((port) == PORT_C ? 24 : \ + (port) + 10)) +#define ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_TC_CLK_OFF(tc_port) (1 << ((tc_port) < PORT_TC4 ? \ + (tc_port) + 12 : \ + (tc_port) - PORT_TC4 + 21)) #define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(port) ((port) == PORT_F ? 21 : \ (port) * 2) #define DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(port) (3 << DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(port))
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
