Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: fix include order in intel_tc.*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 07:56:09PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jul 2019 19:43:12 +0200, Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 07:21:38PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> > > On Thu, 04 Jul 2019 02:06:47 +0200, Lucas De Marchi
> > > <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Make intel_tc.h the first include so we guarantee it's self-contained.
> > > > Sort the rest. Same principle applies for includes in the header.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 5 +++--
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h | 5 +++--
> > > >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > > > index 1a9dd32fb0a5..e6e6163c1232 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > > > @@ -3,10 +3,11 @@
> > > >   * Copyright © 2019 Intel Corporation
> > > >   */
> > > > +#include "intel_tc.h"
> > > > +
> > > > +#include "i915_drv.h"
> > > 
> > > this master header will likely include everything, so while
> > > your .h is now self-contained, .c remains unclean
> > > 
> > > >  #include "intel_display.h"
> > > >  #include "intel_dp_mst.h"
> > > > -#include "i915_drv.h"
> > > > -#include "intel_tc.h"
> > > > static const char *tc_port_mode_name(enum tc_port_mode mode)
> > > >  {
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> > > > index 0d8411d4a91d..45ae30537b78 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> > > > @@ -6,10 +6,11 @@
> > > >  #ifndef __INTEL_TC_H__
> > > >  #define __INTEL_TC_H__
> > > > -#include <linux/types.h>
> > > > -#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > > >  #include "intel_drv.h"
> > > 
> > > are you sure you want this giant header to be included here?
> > > note that it will #include almost everything (i915_drv.h too)
> > > and may introduce hard to resolve circular dependencies
> > > 
> > > > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > > 
> > > we don't need mutex definitions here in current header file
> > > 
> > > > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > so you need only above types.h and then add forward decl for:
> > > 
> > > struct intel_digital_port;
> > 
> > Both the mutex and intel_digital_port definitions are needed by
> > intel_tc_port_ref_held() in this header.
> 
> oops, sorry, didn't scroll down to see intel_tc_port_ref_held() inline.
> 
> but wait, it is used only once in intel_display_power.c so
> maybe this inline can be moved to one of the .c file ?

Imo a simple function is ok as inline and it should be defined with the
rest of TypeC functions.

> also, maybe it's time to move struct intel_digital_port definition
> out of intel_drv.h ?

Not sure what would be a good division, it's used by a few
platforms/output types. But yea, sounds like a good idea as a follow-up.

>
> > > 
> > > >  bool intel_tc_port_connected(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> > > >  u32 intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> > > >  int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port
> > > > *dig_port);
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux