On 03/07/2019 10:17, Chris Wilson wrote:
We don't care about the result of the read, so it may be garbage, we
only care that the mmio is flushed. As such, we can forgo using an
individual forcewake and lock around any posting-read for an engine.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
index 557b08b13feb..0331e9ac2485 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct drm_printer;
#define ENGINE_READ16(...) __ENGINE_READ_OP(read16, __VA_ARGS__)
#define ENGINE_READ(...) __ENGINE_READ_OP(read, __VA_ARGS__)
#define ENGINE_READ_FW(...) __ENGINE_READ_OP(read_fw, __VA_ARGS__)
-#define ENGINE_POSTING_READ(...) __ENGINE_READ_OP(posting_read, __VA_ARGS__)
+#define ENGINE_POSTING_READ(...) __ENGINE_READ_OP(posting_read_fw, __VA_ARGS__)
#define ENGINE_POSTING_READ16(...) __ENGINE_READ_OP(posting_read16, __VA_ARGS__)
#define ENGINE_READ64(engine__, lower_reg__, upper_reg__) \
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Can we apply this to all posting reads? (intel_uncore_posting_read*)
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
