Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-07-02 11:23:11)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Some interrupt handling functions already have gt in their names
> suggesting them as obvious candidates to make them take struct intel_gt
> instead of i915.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> Co-authored-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
> static void
> -gen11_other_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private * const i915,
> - const u8 instance, const u16 iir)
> +gen11_other_irq_handler(struct intel_gt *gt, const u8 instance,
> + const u16 iir)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> +
> if (instance == OTHER_GUC_INSTANCE)
> return gen11_guc_irq_handler(i915, iir);
That looks like a candidate for gt as well. Even for the guc, the
interrupt vector is GT centric. I was hoping we could place guc/ parallel
to gt/, but it looks like it will indeed be a child of intel_gt.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
