On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:34:42PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:07 PM Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > In the transcoder port sync mode, the slave transcoders mask their vblanks
> > until master transcoder's vblank so while disabling them, make
> > sure slaves are disabled first and then the masters.
> >
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index 0a0d97ef03d6..85746a26d0e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -13901,6 +13901,106 @@ static void intel_commit_modeset_disables(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void icl_commit_modeset_disables(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
> > + struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > + struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state, *new_crtc_state;
> > + struct intel_crtc_state *new_intel_crtc_state, *old_intel_crtc_state;
> > + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Disable all the Port Sync Slaves first
> > + */
> > + for_each_oldnew_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state, i) {
> > + old_intel_crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(old_crtc_state);
> > + new_intel_crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(new_crtc_state);
> > + intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > +
> > + if (!needs_modeset(new_crtc_state) ||
> > + !is_trans_port_sync_slave(old_intel_crtc_state))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + intel_pre_plane_update(old_intel_crtc_state, new_intel_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + if (old_crtc_state->active) {
> > + intel_crtc_disable_planes(intel_state, intel_crtc);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We need to disable pipe CRC before disabling the pipe,
> > + * or we race against vblank off.
> > + */
> > + intel_crtc_disable_pipe_crc(intel_crtc);
> > +
> > + dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(old_intel_crtc_state, state);
> > + intel_crtc->active = false;
> > + intel_fbc_disable(intel_crtc);
> > + intel_disable_shared_dpll(old_intel_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Underruns don't always raise interrupts,
> > + * so check manually.
> > + */
> > + intel_check_cpu_fifo_underruns(dev_priv);
> > + intel_check_pch_fifo_underruns(dev_priv);
> > +
> > + /* FIXME unify this for all platforms */
> > + if (!new_crtc_state->active &&
> > + !HAS_GMCH(dev_priv) &&
> > + dev_priv->display.initial_watermarks)
> > + dev_priv->display.initial_watermarks(intel_state,
> > + new_intel_crtc_state);
> > + }
I will move this part inside if (old_crtc_state->active) to a helper function.
Any suggestions on the name of this helper?
Manasi
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Disable rest of the CRTCs other than slaves
> > + */
> > + for_each_oldnew_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state, i) {
> > + old_intel_crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(old_crtc_state);
> > + new_intel_crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(new_crtc_state);
> > + intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > +
> > + if (!needs_modeset(new_crtc_state) ||
> > + is_trans_port_sync_slave(old_intel_crtc_state))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + intel_pre_plane_update(old_intel_crtc_state, new_intel_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + if (old_crtc_state->active) {
> > + intel_crtc_disable_planes(intel_state, intel_crtc);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We need to disable pipe CRC before disabling the pipe,
> > + * or we race against vblank off.
> > + */
> > + intel_crtc_disable_pipe_crc(intel_crtc);
> > +
> > + dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(old_intel_crtc_state, state);
> > + intel_crtc->active = false;
> > + intel_fbc_disable(intel_crtc);
> > + intel_disable_shared_dpll(old_intel_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Underruns don't always raise interrupts,
> > + * so check manually.
> > + */
> > + intel_check_cpu_fifo_underruns(dev_priv);
> > + intel_check_pch_fifo_underruns(dev_priv);
> > +
> > + /* FIXME unify this for all platforms */
> > + if (!new_crtc_state->active &&
> > + !HAS_GMCH(dev_priv) &&
> > + dev_priv->display.initial_watermarks)
> > + dev_priv->display.initial_watermarks(intel_state,
> > + new_intel_crtc_state);
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Not a fan of this duplicate code here. At least a helper function
> would be needed.
>
> Jose, didn't you have a pending patch to disable in reverse order to
> solve this same problem?
>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
> > +}
> > +
> > static void intel_commit_modeset_enables(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> > {
> > struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > @@ -14257,6 +14357,11 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> >
> > intel_atomic_commit_fence_wait(intel_state);
> >
> > + drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_dependencies(state);
> > +
> > + if (intel_state->modeset)
> > + wakeref = intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET);
> > +
> > for_each_oldnew_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state, i) {
> > new_intel_crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(new_crtc_state);
> > intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > @@ -14269,11 +14374,6 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_dependencies(state);
> > -
> > - if (intel_state->modeset)
> > - wakeref = intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET);
> > -
> > dev_priv->display.commit_modeset_disables(state);
> >
> > /* FIXME: Eventually get rid of our intel_crtc->config pointer */
> > @@ -16170,7 +16270,12 @@ void intel_init_display_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > else
> > dev_priv->display.commit_modeset_enables = intel_commit_modeset_enables;
> >
> > - dev_priv->display.commit_modeset_disables = intel_commit_modeset_disables;
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > + dev_priv->display.commit_modeset_disables =
> > + icl_commit_modeset_disables;
> > + else
> > + dev_priv->display.commit_modeset_disables =
> > + intel_commit_modeset_disables;
> >
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.19.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
>
> --
> Lucas De Marchi
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
