On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 04:14:53PM +0300, Ser, Simon wrote: > On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 11:02 +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote: > > On 27/06/2019 08:02, Ser, Simon wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 14:08 +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote: > > > > On 18/06/2019 13:42, Guillaume Tucker wrote: > > > > > Add Docker image and Gitlab CI steps to run builds and tests for > > > > > the > > > > > MIPS architecture using Debian Stretch with backports. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Notes: > > > > > v2: use stretch-backports and require libatomic1 > > > > > v3: add mips ci tests and require Debian libatomic1 for mips > > > > > > > > The series to use portable atomics functions was merged today, so > > > > I think this one should now be good to go as well. It applies > > > > cleanly on top of the current master branch and the Gitlab CI > > > > pipeline passed: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gtucker/igt-gpu-tools/pipelines/44704 > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you want me to resubmit it to get another > > > > Patchwork CI run or if anything else needs to be done. > > > > > > LGTM! > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Ser <simon.ser@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > And pushed: > > > > > > To gitlab.freedesktop.org:drm/igt-gpu-tools.git > > > 15ad66453441..439a9f5d615f master -> master > > > > Thanks! > > > > Err, however it looks like you pushed the v2 which had only > > builds rather than this v3 which does builds and tests: > > > > 439a9f5d615f gitlab-ci: add build for MIPS > > > > I've made another patch with the difference between v2 and v3 and > > pushed it to my branch: > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gtucker/igt-gpu-tools/commit/9693e28871f27efb7340ad29d54de4be7b5461a9 > > > > I'll wait for the Gitlab CI pipeline to complete and then I guess > > I should send that to the mailing list. > > Bleh, I'm sorry about this! It seems like patchwork got confused. > > I'll gladly review and merge a fix, feel free to Cc me :) The title of the first patch has changed, so patchwork treats it as a separate series instead of a revision to existing one. It's safer to take the patchwork links (both to series and the mbox) from the CI results instead of trying to browse for them yourself. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
