Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/i915: timeline semaphore support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/06/2019 13:21, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-06-27 09:03:37)
Hi,

This revision gets rid of the synchronous wait. We now implement the
synchronous wait as part of the userspace driver. A thread is spawned
for each engine and waits for availability of the syncobjs before
calling into execbuffer.
Why would you do that? It's not like the kernel already has the ability
to serialises execution asynchronously...
-Chris

Maybe I didn't express myself well.

There is a requirement from the Vulkan spec that we should be able to queue a workload depending on fences that haven't materialized yet.


The last revision implemented that in the i915 by blocking in the execbuffer until the input fences had all materialized.

We moved that into the userspace driver. That makes the i915 execbuffer path not block (which is one thing you mentioned was a behavior change in rev1).

It also makes Anv not block on QueueSubmit() because it hands over the waiting to a thread dedicated to the queue.


-Lionel

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux