Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-06-19 14:12:46) > Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > In the unlikely case the request completes while we regard it as not even > > executing on the GPU (see the next patch!), we have to flush any pending > > execution callbacks at retirement and ensure that we do not add any > > more. > > > > I did see the next patch. Looked like a mountain. > > Well we don't lose warnings and we should never see > a precompleted request with current codebase so, That is very true. I had a little freak out when I found the race, and believed a sigh of relief on realising it only affected the next path. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
