Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Update workarounds selftest for read only regs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 18/06/2019 02:01, John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: "Robert M. Fosha" <robert.m.fosha@xxxxxxxxx>

Updates the live_workarounds selftest to handle whitelisted
registers that are flagged as read only.

Signed-off-by: Robert M. Fosha <robert.m.fosha@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c    | 43 +++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
index c8d335d63f9c..eb6d3aa2c8cc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
@@ -408,6 +408,29 @@ static bool wo_register(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 reg)
  	return false;
  }
+static bool ro_register(u32 reg)
+{
+	if (reg & RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RD)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static int whitelist_writable_count(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+	int count = engine->whitelist.count;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < engine->whitelist.count; i++) {
+		u32 reg = i915_mmio_reg_offset(engine->whitelist.list[i].reg);
+
+		if (ro_register(reg))
+			count--;
+	}
+
+	return count;
+}
+
  static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
  				 struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  {
@@ -463,6 +486,9 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
  		if (wo_register(engine, reg))
  			continue;
+ if (ro_register(reg))
+			continue;
+
  		srm = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM;
  		lrm = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM;
  		if (INTEL_GEN(ctx->i915) >= 8)
@@ -734,9 +760,13 @@ static int read_whitelisted_registers(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
for (i = 0; i < engine->whitelist.count; i++) {
  		u64 offset = results->node.start + sizeof(u32) * i;
+		u32 reg = i915_mmio_reg_offset(engine->whitelist.list[i].reg);
+
+		/* Clear RD only and WR only flags */
+		reg &= ~(RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RD | RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_WR);
*cs++ = srm;
-		*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(engine->whitelist.list[i].reg);
+		*cs++ = reg;
  		*cs++ = lower_32_bits(offset);
  		*cs++ = upper_32_bits(offset);
  	}
@@ -769,9 +799,14 @@ static int scrub_whitelisted_registers(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
  		goto err_batch;
  	}
- *cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(engine->whitelist.count);
+	*cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(whitelist_writable_count(engine));
  	for (i = 0; i < engine->whitelist.count; i++) {
-		*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(engine->whitelist.list[i].reg);
+		u32 reg = i915_mmio_reg_offset(engine->whitelist.list[i].reg);
+
+		if (ro_register(reg))
+			continue;
+

Are we not able to test the read-only property at all?

Regards,

Tvrtko

+		*cs++ = reg;
  		*cs++ = 0xffffffff;
  	}
  	*cs++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
@@ -956,7 +991,7 @@ static int live_isolated_whitelist(void *arg)
  	}
for_each_engine(engine, i915, id) {
-		if (!engine->whitelist.count)
+		if (!whitelist_writable_count(engine))
  			continue;
/* Read default values */

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux