On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 05:21:39PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 14/06/2019 17:16, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:36:57PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 14/06/2019 16:25, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:17:06PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > Start using the newly introduced struct intel_gt to fuse together correct
> > > > > logical init flow with uncore for more removal of implicit dev_priv in
> > > > > mmio access.
> > > > >
> > > > > v2:
> > > > > * Move code to i915_gem_fence_reg. (Chris)
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 +--
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 -
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 25 +--------------
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h | 3 ++
> > > > > 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > > > index 97155c5eb7e1..1df76f7c717e 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > > > @@ -2935,7 +2935,7 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
> > > > > intel_uc_resume(dev_priv);
> > > > > - i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
> > > > > + intel_gt_init_swizzling(&dev_priv->gt);
> > > > > i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
> > > > > enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
> > > > > @@ -3036,7 +3036,7 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
> > > > > * No point of rolling back things in case of an error, as the best
> > > > > * we can do is to hope that things will still work (and disable RPM).
> > > > > */
> > > > > - i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
> > > > > + intel_gt_init_swizzling(&dev_priv->gt);
> > > > > i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
> > > > > /*
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > > index e2c8813c9355..1eb203fdee60 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > > @@ -2586,7 +2586,6 @@ bool i915_gem_unset_wedged(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > > > > void i915_gem_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> > > > > int __must_check i915_gem_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > > > > int __must_check i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > > > > -void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > > > > void i915_gem_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > > > > void i915_gem_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > > > > int i915_gem_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > > > > index 7fdf252f9322..5c0db934315b 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > > > > @@ -1205,29 +1205,6 @@ void i915_gem_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > > > > mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> > > > > }
> > > > > -void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 5 ||
> > > > > - dev_priv->mm.bit_6_swizzle_x == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE)
> > > > > - return;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - I915_WRITE(DISP_ARB_CTL, I915_READ(DISP_ARB_CTL) |
> > > > > - DISP_TILE_SURFACE_SWIZZLING);
> > > > > -
> > > > > - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5))
> > > > > - return;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - I915_WRITE(TILECTL, I915_READ(TILECTL) | TILECTL_SWZCTL);
> > > > > - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6))
> > > > > - I915_WRITE(ARB_MODE, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_SNB));
> > > > > - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7))
> > > > > - I915_WRITE(ARB_MODE, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_IVB));
> > > > > - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 8))
> > > > > - I915_WRITE(GAMTARBMODE, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_BDW));
> > > > > - else
> > > > > - BUG();
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -
> > > > > static void init_unused_ring(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 base)
> > > > > {
> > > > > I915_WRITE(RING_CTL(base), 0);
> > > > > @@ -1274,7 +1251,7 @@ int i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > > > /* ...and determine whether they are sticking. */
> > > > > intel_gt_verify_workarounds(dev_priv, "init");
> > > > > - i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
> > > > > + intel_gt_init_swizzling(&dev_priv->gt);
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * At least 830 can leave some of the unused rings
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
> > > > > index 1c9466676caf..fc268599a0c3 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
> > > > > @@ -834,3 +834,40 @@ void i915_ggtt_init_fences(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
> > > > > i915_gem_restore_fences(i915);
> > > > > }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +void intel_gt_init_swizzling(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> > > > > + struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 5 ||
> > > > > + i915->mm.bit_6_swizzle_x == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE)
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> > > > > + DISP_ARB_CTL,
> > > > > + intel_uncore_read(uncore, DISP_ARB_CTL) |
> > > > > + DISP_TILE_SURFACE_SWIZZLING);
> > > >
> > > > could we change this to intel_uncore_rmw ?
> > > >
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (IS_GEN(i915, 5))
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> > > > > + TILECTL,
> > > > > + intel_uncore_read(uncore, TILECTL) | TILECTL_SWZCTL);
> > > >
> > > > and here as well?
> > >
> > > Yes of course.. marking as TODO.
> >
> > ops, and I forgot to state that with that already add
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks! I however planned to consolidate with rmw in a separate patch. Just
> to keep different class of changes separate. Can I keep the r-b for this
> patch as is in this case?
oh, sure! whatever is easier
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
