On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 15:43 +0300, Petri Latvala wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:24:53PM +0300, Ser, Simon wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 13:00 +0300, Petri Latvala wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:53:20PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote: > > > > Add libatomic to the Fedora docker image so it can link binaries that > > > > use __atomic_* functions. Also explicitly add libatomic1 to Debian > > > > docker images even though it's already installed as a dependency. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Dockerfile.debian | 1 + > > > > Dockerfile.debian-arm64 | 1 + > > > > Dockerfile.debian-armhf | 1 + > > > > Dockerfile.fedora | 2 +- > > > > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Dockerfile.debian b/Dockerfile.debian > > > > index b9c3be3945e0..d23591850c4e 100644 > > > > --- a/Dockerfile.debian > > > > +++ b/Dockerfile.debian > > > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ RUN apt-get install -y \ > > > > flex \ > > > > bison \ > > > > pkg-config \ > > > > + libatomic1 \ > > > > libpciaccess-dev \ > > > > libkmod-dev \ > > > > libprocps-dev \ > > > > diff --git a/Dockerfile.debian-arm64 b/Dockerfile.debian-arm64 > > > > index 7b3a3c7ca803..003bb22b3215 100644 > > > > --- a/Dockerfile.debian-arm64 > > > > +++ b/Dockerfile.debian-arm64 > > > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ RUN apt-get install -y \ > > > > flex \ > > > > bison \ > > > > pkg-config \ > > > > + libatomic1 \ > > > > x11proto-dri2-dev \ > > > > python-docutils \ > > > > valgrind \ > > > > diff --git a/Dockerfile.debian-armhf b/Dockerfile.debian-armhf > > > > index c67a1e2acf6a..3139927c193a 100644 > > > > --- a/Dockerfile.debian-armhf > > > > +++ b/Dockerfile.debian-armhf > > > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ RUN apt-get install -y \ > > > > flex \ > > > > bison \ > > > > pkg-config \ > > > > + libatomic1 \ > > > > > > libatomic1 is the runtime lib, for linking you need the package that > > > contains libatomic.so. That is *quick search* > > > libgcc-$version-dev. There doesn't seem to be a generic metapackage > > > for "the latest libgcc-dev", other than... 'gcc'. > > > > > > Since Debian is acting a bit speshul here I'd just drop the explicit > > > libatomic installation. > > > > Hmm, I see the .so in libatomic1… > > > > https://packages.debian.org/jessie/amd64/libatomic1/filelist > > Where? I only see the .so.1 and .so.1.1.0 Bleh, indeed _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
