Re: [RFC 08/12] drm/i915: Remove I915_POSTING_READ_FW

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 07 Jun 2019, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Only a few call sites remain which have been converted to uncore mmio
> accessors and so the macro can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h             |  1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c             |  9 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c             |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c |  4 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c             | 31 +++++++++++----------
>  5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 13815795e197..9dcec93426de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2891,7 +2891,6 @@ extern void intel_display_print_error_state(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *e,
>   */
>  #define I915_READ_FW(reg__) __I915_REG_OP(read_fw, dev_priv, (reg__))
>  #define I915_WRITE_FW(reg__, val__) __I915_REG_OP(write_fw, dev_priv, (reg__), (val__))
> -#define POSTING_READ_FW(reg__) __I915_REG_OP(posting_read_fw, dev_priv, (reg__))
>  
>  /* "Broadcast RGB" property */
>  #define INTEL_BROADCAST_RGB_AUTO 0
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 9f2e213c6046..94d85b0fb860 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -263,11 +263,12 @@ void i915_gem_flush_ggtt_writes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	i915_gem_chipset_flush(dev_priv);
>  
>  	with_intel_runtime_pm(dev_priv, wakeref) {
> -		spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> +		struct intel_uncore *uncore = &dev_priv->uncore;
>  
> -		POSTING_READ_FW(RING_HEAD(RENDER_RING_BASE));
> -
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> +		spin_lock_irq(&uncore->lock);
> +		intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(uncore,
> +					     RING_HEAD(RENDER_RING_BASE));
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&uncore->lock);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index ca8f4226e598..0763ffffea53 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static void ilk_update_gt_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  void gen5_enable_gt_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mask)
>  {
>  	ilk_update_gt_irq(dev_priv, mask, mask);
> -	POSTING_READ_FW(GTIMR);
> +	intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(&dev_priv->uncore, GTIMR);
>  }
>  
>  void gen5_disable_gt_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mask)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 89592ef778b8..97f6970d8da8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -557,10 +557,10 @@ static void guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
>   */
>  static void flush_ggtt_writes(struct i915_vma *vma)
>  {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = vma->vm->i915;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = vma->vm->i915;
>  
>  	if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma))
> -		POSTING_READ_FW(GUC_STATUS);
> +		intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(&i915->uncore, GUC_STATUS);
>  }
>  
>  static void inject_preempt_context(struct work_struct *work)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 93e411e6ad19..84588ff8732f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -1949,6 +1949,7 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> +	struct intel_uncore *uncore = &dev_priv->uncore;
>  	const struct vlv_fifo_state *fifo_state =
>  		&crtc_state->wm.vlv.fifo_state;
>  	int sprite0_start, sprite1_start, fifo_size;
> @@ -1974,13 +1975,13 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	 * intel_pipe_update_start() has already disabled interrupts
>  	 * for us, so a plain spin_lock() is sufficient here.
>  	 */
> -	spin_lock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> +	spin_lock(&uncore->lock);
>  
>  	switch (crtc->pipe) {
>  		u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>  	case PIPE_A:
> -		dsparb = I915_READ_FW(DSPARB);
> -		dsparb2 = I915_READ_FW(DSPARB2);
> +		dsparb = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB);
> +		dsparb2 = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB2);
>  
>  		dsparb &= ~(VLV_FIFO(SPRITEA, 0xff) |
>  			    VLV_FIFO(SPRITEB, 0xff));
> @@ -1992,12 +1993,12 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		dsparb2 |= (VLV_FIFO(SPRITEA_HI, sprite0_start >> 8) |
>  			   VLV_FIFO(SPRITEB_HI, sprite1_start >> 8));
>  
> -		I915_WRITE_FW(DSPARB, dsparb);
> -		I915_WRITE_FW(DSPARB2, dsparb2);
> +		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, DSPARB, dsparb);
> +		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, DSPARB2, dsparb2);
>  		break;
>  	case PIPE_B:
> -		dsparb = I915_READ_FW(DSPARB);
> -		dsparb2 = I915_READ_FW(DSPARB2);
> +		dsparb = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB);
> +		dsparb2 = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB2);
>  
>  		dsparb &= ~(VLV_FIFO(SPRITEC, 0xff) |
>  			    VLV_FIFO(SPRITED, 0xff));
> @@ -2009,12 +2010,12 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		dsparb2 |= (VLV_FIFO(SPRITEC_HI, sprite0_start >> 8) |
>  			   VLV_FIFO(SPRITED_HI, sprite1_start >> 8));
>  
> -		I915_WRITE_FW(DSPARB, dsparb);
> -		I915_WRITE_FW(DSPARB2, dsparb2);
> +		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, DSPARB, dsparb);
> +		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, DSPARB2, dsparb2);
>  		break;
>  	case PIPE_C:
> -		dsparb3 = I915_READ_FW(DSPARB3);
> -		dsparb2 = I915_READ_FW(DSPARB2);
> +		dsparb3 = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB3);
> +		dsparb2 = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB2);
>  
>  		dsparb3 &= ~(VLV_FIFO(SPRITEE, 0xff) |
>  			     VLV_FIFO(SPRITEF, 0xff));
> @@ -2026,16 +2027,16 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		dsparb2 |= (VLV_FIFO(SPRITEE_HI, sprite0_start >> 8) |
>  			   VLV_FIFO(SPRITEF_HI, sprite1_start >> 8));
>  
> -		I915_WRITE_FW(DSPARB3, dsparb3);
> -		I915_WRITE_FW(DSPARB2, dsparb2);
> +		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, DSPARB3, dsparb3);
> +		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, DSPARB2, dsparb2);
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	POSTING_READ_FW(DSPARB);
> +	intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB);
>  
> -	spin_unlock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&uncore->lock);
>  }
>  
>  #undef VLV_FIFO

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux