Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Measure the baseline latency between contexts in order to directly
> compare that with the additional cost of preemption.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_exec_latency.c | 230 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 230 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_latency.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_latency.c
> index e56d62780..e88fbbc6a 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_latency.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_latency.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,86 @@ static void latency_from_ring(int fd,
> }
> }
>
> +static void execution_latency(int i915, unsigned int ring, const char *name)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
> + .handle = gem_create(i915, 4095),
> + };
> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = {
> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
> + .buffer_count = 1,
> + .flags = ring | LOCAL_I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC | LOCAL_I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT,
> + };
> + const unsigned int mmio_base = 0x2000;
> + const unsigned int cs_timestamp = mmio_base + 0x358;
> + volatile uint32_t *timestamp;
> + uint32_t *cs, *result;
> +
> + timestamp =
> + (volatile uint32_t *)((volatile char *)igt_global_mmio + cs_timestamp);
> +
> + obj.handle = gem_create(i915, 4096);
> + obj.flags = EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED;
> + result = gem_mmap__wc(i915, obj.handle, 0, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> + cs = result + 16 * i;
> + *cs++ = 0x24 << 23 | 2; /* SRM */
> + *cs++ = cs_timestamp;
> + *cs++ = 4096 - 16 * 4 + i * 4;
> + *cs++ = 0;
> + *cs++ = 0xa << 23;
Why not MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END? To emphasize that we have
multiple batches inside a bo?
> + }
> +
> + cs = result + 1024 - 16;
> +
> + for (int length = 2; length <= 16; length <<= 1) {
> + struct igt_mean submit, batch, total;
> + int last = length - 1;
> +
> + igt_mean_init(&submit);
> + igt_mean_init(&batch);
> + igt_mean_init(&total);
> +
> + igt_until_timeout(2) {
> + uint32_t now, end;
> +
> + cs[last] = 0;
> +
> + now = *timestamp;
> + for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
> + execbuf.batch_start_offset = 64 * i;
> + gem_execbuf(i915, &execbuf);
> + }
> + while (!((volatile uint32_t *)cs)[last])
> + ;
> + end = *timestamp;
> +
> + igt_mean_add(&submit, (cs[0] - now) * rcs_clock);
> + igt_mean_add(&batch, (cs[last] - cs[0]) * rcs_clock / last);
Just curious of what do you use of inter batch latency?
Oh and do we need to to take the rcs_clock resolution into account
on result calculation. Prolly not as it seems to be ticking fast enough
for 0.1us accuracy.
> + igt_mean_add(&total, (end - now) * rcs_clock);
> + }
> +
> + igt_info("%sx%d Submission latency: %.2f±%.2fus\n",
> + name, length,
> + 1e-3 * igt_mean_get(&submit),
> + 1e-3 * sqrt(igt_mean_get_variance(&submit)));
> +
> + igt_info("%sx%d Inter-batch latency: %.2f±%.2fus\n",
> + name, length,
> + 1e-3 * igt_mean_get(&batch),
> + 1e-3 * sqrt(igt_mean_get_variance(&batch)));
> +
> + igt_info("%sx%d End-to-end latency: %.2f±%.2fus\n",
> + name, length,
> + 1e-3 * igt_mean_get(&total),
> + 1e-3 * sqrt(igt_mean_get_variance(&total)));
> + }
> +
> + munmap(result, 4096);
> + gem_close(i915, obj.handle);
> +}
> +
> static void
> __submit_spin(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin, unsigned int flags)
> {
> @@ -616,6 +696,142 @@ rthog_latency_on_ring(int fd, unsigned int engine, const char *name, unsigned in
> munmap(results, MMAP_SZ);
> }
>
> +static void context_switch(int i915,
> + unsigned int engine, const char *name,
> + unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj[2];
> + struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry reloc[5];
> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb;
> + uint32_t *cs, *bbe, *results, v;
> + unsigned int mmio_base;
> + struct igt_mean mean;
> + uint32_t ctx[2];
> +
> + /* XXX i915_query()! */
> + switch (engine) {
> + case I915_EXEC_DEFAULT:
> + case I915_EXEC_RENDER:
> + mmio_base = 0x2000;
> + break;
> +#if 0
> + case I915_EXEC_BSD:
> + mmio_base = 0x12000;
> + break;
> +#endif
It seems to be there according to bspec. Timestamps don't
work with it?
> + case I915_EXEC_BLT:
> + mmio_base = 0x22000;
> + break;
> +
> + case I915_EXEC_VEBOX:
> + if (intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(i915)) >= 11)
> + mmio_base = 0x1d8000;
> + else
> + mmio_base = 0x1a000;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + igt_skip("mmio base not known\n");
> + }
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ctx); i++)
> + ctx[i] = gem_context_create(i915);
> +
> + if (flags & PREEMPT) {
> + gem_context_set_priority(i915, ctx[0], -1023);
> + gem_context_set_priority(i915, ctx[1], +1023);
> + }
> +
> + memset(obj, 0, sizeof(obj));
> + obj[0].handle = gem_create(i915, 4096);
> + gem_set_caching(i915, obj[0].handle, 1);
> + results = gem_mmap__cpu(i915, obj[0].handle, 0, 4096, PROT_READ);
> + gem_set_domain(i915, obj[0].handle, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU, 0);
> +
> + obj[1].handle = gem_create(i915, 4096);
> + memset(reloc,0, sizeof(reloc));
> + obj[1].relocation_count = ARRAY_SIZE(reloc);
> + obj[1].relocs_ptr = to_user_pointer(reloc);
> + bbe = gem_mmap__wc(i915, obj[1].handle, 0, 4096, PROT_WRITE);
> + gem_set_domain(i915, obj[1].handle,
> + I915_GEM_DOMAIN_WC, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_WC);
> +
> + cs = bbe;
> + *cs++ = 0x5 << 23;
/* ARB_CHK */
or even better MI_ARB_CHK;
> + *cs++ = 0x24 << 23 | 2; /* SRM */
> + *cs++ = mmio_base + 0x358; /* TIMESTAMP */
> + reloc[0].target_handle = obj[0].handle;
> + reloc[0].offset = (cs - bbe) * sizeof(*cs);
> + *cs++ = 0;
> + *cs++ = 0;
> + *cs++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | 1;
> + reloc[1].target_handle = obj[1].handle;
> + reloc[1].offset = (cs - bbe) * sizeof(*cs);
> + *cs++ = 0;
> + *cs++ = 0;
> +
> + cs = bbe + 64;
> + *cs++ = 0x24 << 23 | 2; /* SRM */
> + *cs++ = mmio_base + 0x358; /* TIMESTAMP */
> + reloc[2].target_handle = obj[0].handle;
> + reloc[2].offset = (cs - bbe) * sizeof(*cs);
> + *cs++ = reloc[2].delta = 4;
> + *cs++ = 0;
> + *cs++ = 0x29 << 23 | 2; /* LRM */
> + *cs++ = mmio_base + 0x600; /* GPR0 */
> + reloc[3].target_handle = obj[0].handle;
> + reloc[3].offset = (cs - bbe) * sizeof(*cs);
> + *cs++ = 0;
> + *cs++ = 0;
> + *cs++ = 0x24 << 23 | 2; /* SRM */
> + *cs++ = mmio_base + 0x600; /* GPR0 */
> + reloc[4].target_handle = obj[0].handle;
> + reloc[4].offset = (cs - bbe) * sizeof(*cs);
> + *cs++ = reloc[4].delta = 8;
> + *cs++ = 0;
> + *cs++ = 0xa << 23;
> +
> + memset(&eb, 0, sizeof(eb));
> + eb.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(obj);
> + eb.buffer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(obj);
> + eb.flags = engine;
> + eb.flags |= LOCAL_I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC;
> +
> + v = 0;
> + igt_mean_init(&mean);
> + igt_until_timeout(5) {
> + eb.rsvd1 = ctx[0];
> + eb.batch_start_offset = 0;
> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
> +
> + while (results[0] == v)
> + igt_assert(gem_bo_busy(i915, obj[1].handle));
Is there a race there? Object will be busy short time
after the result appears.
> +
> + eb.rsvd1 = ctx[1];
> + eb.batch_start_offset = 64 * sizeof(*cs);
> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
> +
> + *bbe = 0xa << 23;
__sync_syncronize or are you relying on the corresponding
syscalls?
-Mika
> + gem_sync(i915, obj[1].handle);
> + *bbe = 0x5 << 23;
> +
> + v = results[0];
> + igt_mean_add(&mean, (results[1] - results[2]) * rcs_clock);
> + }
> + igt_info("%s context switch latency%s: %.2f±%.2fus\n",
> + name, flags & PREEMPT ? " (preempt)" : "",
> + 1e-3 * igt_mean_get(&mean),
> + 1e-3 * sqrt(igt_mean_get_variance(&mean)));
> + munmap(results, 4096);
> + munmap(bbe, 4096);
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(obj); i++)
> + gem_close(i915, obj[i].handle);
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ctx); i++)
> + gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx[i]);
> +}
> +
> static double clockrate(int i915, int reg)
> {
> volatile uint32_t *mmio;
> @@ -722,6 +938,11 @@ igt_main
> e->name,
> 0);
>
> + igt_subtest_f("%s-execution-latency", e->name)
> + execution_latency(device,
> + e->exec_id | e->flags,
> + e->name);
> +
> igt_subtest_f("%s-live-dispatch-queued", e->name)
> latency_on_ring(device,
> e->exec_id | e->flags,
> @@ -741,12 +962,21 @@ igt_main
> e->exec_id | e->flags,
> e->name, CORK);
>
> + igt_subtest_f("%s-cs", e->name)
> + context_switch(device,
> + e->exec_id | e->flags,
> + e->name, 0);
> igt_subtest_group {
> igt_fixture {
> gem_require_contexts(device);
> igt_require(gem_scheduler_has_preemption(device));
> }
>
> + igt_subtest_f("%s-cs-preempt", e->name)
> + context_switch(device,
> + e->exec_id | e->flags,
> + e->name, PREEMPT);
> +
> igt_subtest_f("%s-preemption", e->name)
> latency_from_ring(device,
> e->exec_id | e->flags,
> --
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
