On 29/05/2019 16:04, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019, Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Currently subslice_mask is not initialized and so data is being
>> bit-wise or'd into a garbage value. Fix this by inintializing
>> subslice_mask to zero.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
>> Fixes: 1ac159e23c2c ("drm/i915: Expand subslice mask")
>
> This was already reverted for other reasons. Need to be fixed on the
> next round. For future reference, please Cc: author and reviewers of the
> referenced commit.
OK, will do.
Thanks, Colin
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> index 3625f777f3a3..d395a09b994f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static void cherryview_sseu_info_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> struct sseu_dev_info *sseu = &RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->sseu;
>> u32 fuse;
>> - u8 subslice_mask;
>> + u8 subslice_mask = 0;
>>
>> fuse = I915_READ(CHV_FUSE_GT);
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
