On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 09:08:58AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:53:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > I honestly have no idea what the subtle differences between > > con_is_visible, con_is_fg (internal to vt.c) and con_is_bound are. But > > it looks like both vc->vc_display_fg and con_driver_map are protected > > by the console_lock, so probably better if we hold that when checking > > this. > > > > To do that I had to deinline the con_is_visible function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Martin Hostettler <textshell@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Greg, > > Do you want to merge this through your console tree or ack for merging > through drm/fbdev? It's part of a bigger series, and I'd like to have more > testing with this in our trees, but also ok to merge stand-alone if you > prefer that. It's just locking checks and some docs. > > Same for the preceeding patch in this series here. For all of these, please take them through your tree(s): Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
