On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:09:41AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2019, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Pushed the core/etc. bits to drm-misc-next so that other drivers > > can base their work on that. We'll need a backmerge to get the > > i915 stuff in via dinq. > > To avoid any confusion, drm-misc-next needs to get merged to drm-next, > which then needs to be backmerged to drm-intel-next-queued. We don't do > merges from drm-misc-next to drm-intel-next-queued directly. Yeah, I mentioned this also on some internal thread for clarification, just to make it clear that backmerges aren't instant. There's apparently also confusing about drm-tip, seems like people didn't know that drm-tip != drm-intel.git and that stuff fromm drm-misc immediately shows up in drm-tip ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
