On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 12:59 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 14 May 2019, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > One possibility that just came to my mind now is, what if we make > > this only for platforms that are still protected by > > is_alpha_support=1 > > (soon becoming require_force_probe=1) > > Please don't conflate alpha_support or force_probe with *anything* > else. > > > But this is just one side of the coin... when product is out there > > and we want the user to debug the issue to see if it is a RC6 bug > > we have no way to verify that. :/ > > The problem is, if it works with rc6 disabled, it doesn't prove it's > an > rc6 bug either. Good point. I'm not saying we should enforce a process of disabling RC6 for the platform if enable_rc6=0 results in success. I'm just saying having the option is useful from a debug perspective. We will still need to do the appropriate full analysis, including the normal code review process on a pre-case basis when debug involves this parameter. But the parameter itself is still useful. Thanks, Stuart > > > BR, > Jani. > >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
