On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 08:59:37AM +0000, Shankar, Uma wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Patchwork [mailto:patchwork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 6:54 AM > >To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Add HDR Metadata Parsing and handling in DRM layer > >(rev10) > > > >== Series Details == > > > >Series: Add HDR Metadata Parsing and handling in DRM layer (rev10) > >URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/25091/ > >State : failure > > > >== Summary == > > > >CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6081_full -> Patchwork_13017_full > >==================================================== > > > >Summary > >------- > > > > **FAILURE** > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_13017_full absolutely need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_13017_full, please notify your bug team to allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > > > > >Possible new issues > >------------------- > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > >Patchwork_13017_full: > > > >### IGT changes ### > > > >#### Possible regressions #### > > > > * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3: > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2] +43 similar issues > > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6081/shard- > >iclb6/igt@gem_exec_suspend@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13017/shard- > >iclb5/igt@gem_exec_suspend@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > * igt@kms_prop_blob@invalid-set-prop-any: > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] > > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6081/shard- > >iclb6/igt@kms_prop_blob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13017/shard- > >iclb5/igt@kms_prop_blob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Hi Martin, > These issues are unrelated to the changes made in this series. Can you please have a look > and confirm. The kms_prop fails at least are real. Probably due to the bogus function arguements to the replace_blob() thing I pointed out. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
