Re: [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/execlists: Don't apply priority boost for resets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 03/05/2019 12:52, Chris Wilson wrote:
Do not treat reset as a normal preemption event and avoid giving the
guilty request a priority boost for simply being active at the time of
reset.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 16 +++++++++-------
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index afcdfc440bbd..6419bcaf1ecc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -371,11 +371,11 @@ static void unwind_wa_tail(struct i915_request *rq)
  }
static struct i915_request *
-__unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+__unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int boost)
  {
  	struct i915_request *rq, *rn, *active = NULL;
  	struct list_head *uninitialized_var(pl);
-	int prio = I915_PRIORITY_INVALID | ACTIVE_PRIORITY;
+	int prio = I915_PRIORITY_INVALID | boost;
lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock); @@ -419,8 +419,9 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  	 * in the priority queue, but they will not gain immediate access to
  	 * the GPU.
  	 */
-	if (~prio & ACTIVE_PRIORITY && __i915_request_has_started(active)) {
-		prio |= ACTIVE_PRIORITY;
+	if (~prio & boost && __i915_request_has_started(active)) {
+		prio |= boost;
+		GEM_BUG_ON(active->sched.attr.priority >= prio);
  		active->sched.attr.priority = prio;
  		list_move_tail(&active->sched.link,
  			       i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio));
@@ -435,7 +436,7 @@ execlists_unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
  	struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
  		container_of(execlists, typeof(*engine), execlists);
- return __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine);
+	return __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine, 0);
  }
static inline void
@@ -656,7 +657,8 @@ static void complete_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
  	execlists_cancel_port_requests(execlists);
  	__unwind_incomplete_requests(container_of(execlists,
  						  struct intel_engine_cs,
-						  execlists));
+						  execlists),
+				     ACTIVE_PRIORITY);
  }
static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -1909,7 +1911,7 @@ static void __execlists_reset(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, bool stalled)
  	execlists_cancel_port_requests(execlists);
/* Push back any incomplete requests for replay after the reset. */
-	rq = __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine);
+	rq = __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine, 0);
  	if (!rq)
  		goto out_replay;

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux