On 5/4/19 8:55 AM, Saarinen, Jani wrote:
Hi,
-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Aditya Swarup
Sent: lauantai 4. toukokuuta 2019 2.04
To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Peres, Martin <martin.peres@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/icl: Set
GCP_COLOR_INDICATION only for 10/12 bit deep color (rev8)
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:46:15PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/icl: Set GCP_COLOR_INDICATION only for 10/12 bit deep color
(rev8)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/58912/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6012_full -> Patchwork_12900_full
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_12900_full absolutely need to
be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_12900_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
Patchwork_12900_full:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@gem_caching@read-writes:
- shard-skl: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] +6 similar issues
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6012/shard-
skl9/igt@gem_caching@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[2]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_12900/shard-skl9/ig
t@gem_caching@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@forked-big-copy-odd:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3] +1 similar issue
[3]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_12900/shard-skl2/ig
t@gem_mmap_gtt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Martin,
These failures shouldn't be due to my patch. Is there a separate bug filed for
gem_caching and gem_mmap_gtt failures?
Yes, this still I guess due to : https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_12900/shard-skl2/run25.log
=> Tomi, still happening: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110581
Br,
Jani
This was fixed around IGT_4972 / CI_DRM_6026. We're looking at results
from around CI_DRM_6012, so yes, 10min timeouts were still happening.
Tomi
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_6012 -> Patchwork_12900
Tomi
--
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
