There is no reason why we couldn't verify the power domains state during
suspend in all cases, so do that. I overlooked this when originally
adding the check.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
index 4a7bfc945322..cc45cbcb43cb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
@@ -4251,10 +4251,10 @@ void intel_power_domains_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
* Even if power well support was disabled we still want to disable
* power wells if power domains must be deinitialized for suspend.
*/
- if (!i915_modparams.disable_power_well) {
+ if (!i915_modparams.disable_power_well)
intel_display_power_put_unchecked(i915, POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
- intel_power_domains_verify_state(i915);
- }
+
+ intel_power_domains_verify_state(i915);
if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 11)
icl_display_core_uninit(i915);
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
