On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 20:02:05 +0000, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 20:18:37 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > Mea culpa, but I agree that it's better to reap this instead of letting it > > languish even longer as some dead code. For the patch itself, this does > > way too much. Imo the gem_write_fence rework and the reaping of the > > pipelining logic should be separate patches (maybe even more) - I don't > > quite see through this patch and follow where things move to. > > I got bored of rewriting the same 200 lines with the incremental churn. > Every patch only made sense as "preparing to rip out pipelining". Meant to add: but since it is you, I'll give it another shot. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
