Re: [patch V3 00/29] stacktrace: Consolidate stack trace usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> -	if (unlikely(!ret))
> +	if (unlikely(!ret)) {
> +		if (!trace->nr_entries) {
> +			/*
> +			 * If save_trace fails here, the printing might
> +			 * trigger a WARN but because of the !nr_entries it
> +			 * should not do bad things.
> +			 */
> +			save_trace(trace);
> +		}
>  		return print_circular_bug(&this, target_entry, next, prev);
> +	}
>  	else if (unlikely(ret < 0))
>  		return print_bfs_bug(ret);

Just a minor style nit: the 'else' should probably on the same line as 
the '}' it belongs to, to make it really obvious that the 'if' has an 
'else' branch?

At that point the condition should probably also use balanced curly 
braces.

Interdiff looks good otherwise.

Thanks,

	Ingo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux