Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Stop overwriting RING_IMR in rcs resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 18/04/2019 14:27, Chris Wilson wrote:
We store the engine->imr mask and set up the RING_IMR register on
restarting the engine. We do not then want to overwrite it with
an incomplete mask later as we may then lose interrupts!

Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 3 ---
  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 029fd8ec1857..00bd9eeb053d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -873,9 +873,6 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  	if (IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 6, 7))
  		I915_WRITE(INSTPM, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(INSTPM_FORCE_ORDERING));
- if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6)
-		ENGINE_WRITE(engine, RING_IMR, ~engine->irq_keep_mask);
-
  	return 0;
  }

Is it perhaps a way to enable L3_DPF on IVB and HSW when breadcrumbs are off (no one listening)? Mind you, the same should be done in this case under execlists for ctx switch irq. I just can't find the code there which unmasks it unless a single engine->irq_enable/irq_disable cycle is guaranteed on load indirectly. Is there a request_wait or wait_for_idle hidden somewhere during init? Or I missed the ball completely?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux