Re: [PATCH 1/4] lib/hexdump.c: Allow 64 bytes per line

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat 2019-04-13 09:22:05, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, 12 April 2019 11:48 PM
> > To: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx; Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Joonas
> > Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rodrigo Vivi
> > <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>; Daniel Vetter
> > <daniel@xxxxxxxx>; Karsten Keil <isdn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jassi Brar
> > <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx>; Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>;
> > David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jose Abreu
> > <Jose.Abreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>; Benson Leung
> > <bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Enric Balletbo i Serra
> > <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; James E.J. Bottomley
> > <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Alexander Viro
> > <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sergey Senozhatsky
> > <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>; Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; intel-
> > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > ath10k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] lib/hexdump.c: Allow 64 bytes per line
> > 
> > On Wed 2019-04-10 13:17:17, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> > > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > With modern high resolution screens, we can display more data, which
> > > makes life a bit easier when debugging.
> > 
> > I have quite some doubts about this feature.
> > 
> > We are talking about more than 256 characters per-line. I wonder if such a
> > long line is really easier to read for a human.
> 
> It's basically 2 separate panes of information side by side, the hexdump and
> the ASCII version.
> 
> I'm using this myself when dealing with the pmem labels, and it works quite
> nicely.

I am sure that it works for you. But I do not believe that it
would be useful in general.


> > I am not expert but there is a reason why the standard is 80 characters
> per-
> > line. I guess that anything above 100 characters is questionable.
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_length
> > somehow confirms that.
> > 
> > Second, if we take 8 pixels per-character. Then we need
> > 2048 to show the 256 characters. It is more than HD.
> > IMHO, there is still huge number of people that even do not have HD
> display,
> > especially on a notebook.
> 
> The intent is to make debugging easier when dealing with large chunks of
> binary data. I don't expect end users to see this output.

How is it supposed to be used then? Only by your temporary patches?

Best Regards,
Petr
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux