Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Introduce struct class_instance for engines across the uAPI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




+Tony to comment on the media-driver views on this.

+Manually re-adding original Cc which did not appear for me from the ML.

On 12/04/2019 07:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
SSEU reprogramming of the context introduced the notion of engine class
and instance for a forwards compatible method of describing any engine
beyond the old execbuf interface. We wish to adopt this class:instance
description for more interfaces, so pull it out into a separate type for
userspace convenience.

References: e46c2e99f600 ("drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration to userspace (Gen11 only)")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Commit e46c2e99f600 ("drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration to
userspace (Gen11 only)") is for v5.1, so we still do have a tiny bit of
time to enact this change.
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c |  8 ++++----
  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h             | 11 +++++++++--
  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
index 7fc34ab6df87..dd728b26b5aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -1386,8 +1386,8 @@ static int set_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
  		return -EINVAL;
engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(i915,
-					  user_sseu.engine_class,
-					  user_sseu.engine_instance);
+					  user_sseu.engine.engine_class,
+					  user_sseu.engine.engine_instance);
  	if (!engine)
  		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1626,8 +1626,8 @@ static int get_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
  		return -EINVAL;
engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(ctx->i915,
-					  user_sseu.engine_class,
-					  user_sseu.engine_instance);
+					  user_sseu.engine.engine_class,
+					  user_sseu.engine.engine_instance);
  	if (!engine)
  		return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
index 52051d24d89d..f6369c462458 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
@@ -1500,6 +1500,14 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_context_param {
  	__u64 value;
  };
+union drm_i915_engine_class_instance {
+	struct i915_engine_class_instance {
+		__u16 engine_class;
+		__u16 engine_instance;
+	} class_instance;
+	__u32 ci;

Is "ci" class instance or something to satisfy the test farm and what is the purpose for the union?

+};
+
  /**
   * Context SSEU programming
   *
@@ -1525,8 +1533,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_context_param_sseu {
  	/*
  	 * Engine class & instance to be configured or queried.
  	 */
-	__u16 engine_class;
-	__u16 engine_instance;
+	struct i915_engine_class_instance engine;
/*
  	 * Unused for now. Must be cleared to zero.


Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux