On Tue, 09 Apr 2019 23:27:41 +0200,
Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> In runtime_resume, we release the local display_power wakeref if we can
> rely on i915 providing a wakeref along the component. On suspend
> therefore, we should only release the display_power if we kept it from
> runtime_resume.
Hrm, it shouldn't matter. After the recent code rewrite, the control
isn't refcount any longer, hence it's fine to call
display_power(false) again even if it were already powered off.
thanks,
Takashi
>
> Fixes: e454ff8e89b6 ("ALSA: hda/intel: Drop superfluous AZX_DCAPS_I915_POWERWELL checks")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This appears to fix the glk-dsi as it performs a pm_runtime_suspend in
> the middle of azx_probe_contime(). Hopefully.
> ---
> sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> index 2ec91085fa3e..a9faf95c88b5 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> @@ -941,10 +941,14 @@ static bool azx_is_pm_ready(struct snd_card *card)
>
> static void __azx_runtime_suspend(struct azx *chip)
> {
> + struct hda_intel *hda = container_of(chip, struct hda_intel, chip);
> +
> azx_stop_chip(chip);
> azx_enter_link_reset(chip);
> azx_clear_irq_pending(chip);
> - display_power(chip, false);
> +
> + if (hda->need_i915_power)
> + display_power(chip, false);
> }
>
> static void __azx_runtime_resume(struct azx *chip, bool from_rt)
> --
> 2.20.1
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
