On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:56:08PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:26 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > > Thanks, patch is:
> > > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu <yuq825@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old IDR API to the
> > XArray API. You should be able to remove mgr->lock entirely, relying on
> > the xa_lock for synchronising free and get.
>
> I'm afraid the a little complex free path may involve some might sleep
> functions so use a mutex lock instead of spinlock.
Ah, good call ...
+ mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
+ ctx = xa_erase(&mgr->handles, id);
+ if (ctx)
+ kref_put(&ctx->refcnt, lima_ctx_do_release);
+ else
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
+static void lima_ctx_do_release(struct kref *ref)
+{
+ struct lima_ctx *ctx = container_of(ref, struct lima_ctx, refcnt);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < lima_pipe_num; i++)
+ lima_sched_context_fini(ctx->dev->pipe + i, ctx->context + i);
+ kfree(ctx);
+}
+void lima_sched_context_fini(struct lima_sched_pipe *pipe,
+ struct lima_sched_context *context)
+{
+ drm_sched_entity_fini(&context->base);
+}
and drm_sched_entity_fini() can call kthread_park(), which does sleep.
> > If you think it's worth it,
> > you could even use kfree_rcu() to free the ctx and kref_get_unless_zero()
> > and then your get path would be lock-free.
>
> I can take a look this way, thanks.
I think that's the only way you can get rid of the mutex, given the
sleeping functions called in the free path.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
