Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-03-25 12:34:44) > Ping? The last patch should be squashed, I think we want to minimize the amount of versions. Or do you intend to backport only portion of the series somewhere? Can you link to the userspace side changes? Regards, Joonas > > On 26/02/2019 14:29, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This third iteration adds an i915 perf revision number through > > getparam so that application can more easily find out what feature of > > i915-perf are available. > > > > The patches containing uAPI updates have been updated to indicate what > > version is required to those changes to be available. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Lionel Landwerlin (9): > > drm/i915/perf: rework aging tail workaround > > drm/i915/perf: move pollin setup to non hw specific code > > drm/i915/perf: only append status when data is available > > drm/i915/perf: introduce a versioning of the i915-perf uapi > > drm/i915/perf: add new open param to configure polling of OA buffer > > drm/i915: handle interrupts from the OA unit > > drm/i915/perf: add interrupt enabling parameter > > drm/i915/perf: add flushing ioctl > > drm/i915/perf: bump i915-perf revision > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 3 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 59 +++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 39 ++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 403 ++++++++++++++---------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 7 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 2 + > > include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 61 ++++ > > 7 files changed, 390 insertions(+), 184 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.20.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
