Re: [PATCH 04/22] drm/i915: Guard unpark/park with the gt.active_mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 25/03/2019 09:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
If we introduce a new mutex for the exclusive use of GEM's runtime power
management, we can remove its requirement of holding the struct_mutex.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c           |  9 +--
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |  3 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c               |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h               |  3 -
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c         |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_pm.c            | 70 ++++++++++++-------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c           | 24 ++-----
  .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c |  4 +-
  .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c  | 13 ++--
  .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c  |  3 +-
  10 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 47bf07a59b5e..98ff1a14ccf3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -2034,7 +2034,8 @@ static int i915_rps_boost_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
seq_printf(m, "RPS enabled? %d\n", rps->enabled);
  	seq_printf(m, "GPU busy? %s [%d requests]\n",
-		   yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake), dev_priv->gt.active_requests);
+		   yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake),
+		   atomic_read(&dev_priv->gt.active_requests));
  	seq_printf(m, "Boosts outstanding? %d\n",
  		   atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters));
  	seq_printf(m, "Interactive? %d\n", READ_ONCE(rps->power.interactive));
@@ -2055,7 +2056,7 @@ static int i915_rps_boost_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6 &&
  	    rps->enabled &&
-	    dev_priv->gt.active_requests) {
+	    atomic_read(&dev_priv->gt.active_requests)) {
  		u32 rpup, rpupei;
  		u32 rpdown, rpdownei;
@@ -3087,7 +3088,7 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) seq_printf(m, "GT awake? %s\n", yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake));
  	seq_printf(m, "Global active requests: %d\n",
-		   dev_priv->gt.active_requests);
+		   atomic_read(&dev_priv->gt.active_requests));
  	seq_printf(m, "CS timestamp frequency: %u kHz\n",
  		   RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz);
@@ -3933,7 +3934,7 @@ i915_drop_caches_set(void *data, u64 val) if (val & DROP_IDLE) {
  		do {
-			if (READ_ONCE(i915->gt.active_requests))
+			if (atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests))
  				flush_delayed_work(&i915->gt.retire_work);
  			drain_delayed_work(&i915->gt.idle_work);
  		} while (READ_ONCE(i915->gt.awake));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 11803d485275..7c7afe99986c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2008,7 +2008,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
  		intel_engine_mask_t active_engines;
  		struct list_head active_rings;
  		struct list_head closed_vma;
-		u32 active_requests;
+		atomic_t active_requests;
+		struct mutex active_mutex;

My initial reaction is why not gem_pm_mutex to match where code was moved and what the commit message says?

/**
  		 * Is the GPU currently considered idle, or busy executing
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 47c672432594..79919e0cf03d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2914,7 +2914,7 @@ wait_for_timelines(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
  	struct i915_gt_timelines *gt = &i915->gt.timelines;
  	struct i915_timeline *tl;
- if (!READ_ONCE(i915->gt.active_requests))
+	if (!atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests))
  		return timeout;
mutex_lock(&gt->mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
index 5c073fe73664..bd13198a9058 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
@@ -77,9 +77,6 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
#define I915_GEM_IDLE_TIMEOUT (HZ / 5) -void i915_gem_park(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
-void i915_gem_unpark(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
-
  static inline void __tasklet_disable_sync_once(struct tasklet_struct *t)
  {
  	if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&t->count))
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
index 060f5903544a..20e835a7f116 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(static struct igt_evict_ctl {
static bool ggtt_is_idle(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  {
-	return !i915->gt.active_requests;
+	return !atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests);
  }
static int ggtt_flush(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_pm.c
index faa4eb42ec0a..6ecd9f8ac87d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_pm.c
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ static void __i915_gem_park(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
GEM_TRACE("\n"); - lockdep_assert_held(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(i915->gt.active_requests);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&i915->gt.active_mutex);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests));
  	GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&i915->gt.active_rings));
if (!i915->gt.awake)
@@ -94,12 +94,13 @@ static void idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
  	if (!READ_ONCE(i915->gt.awake))
  		return;
- if (READ_ONCE(i915->gt.active_requests))
+	if (atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests))
  		return;
rearm_hangcheck =
  		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&i915->gpu_error.hangcheck_work);
+ /* XXX need to support lockless kernel_context before removing! */
  	if (!mutex_trylock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex)) {
  		/* Currently busy, come back later */
  		mod_delayed_work(i915->wq,
@@ -114,18 +115,19 @@ static void idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
  	 * while we are idle (such as the GPU being power cycled), no users
  	 * will be harmed.
  	 */
+	mutex_lock(&i915->gt.active_mutex);
  	if (!work_pending(&i915->gt.idle_work.work) &&
-	    !i915->gt.active_requests) {
-		++i915->gt.active_requests; /* don't requeue idle */
+	    !atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests)) {
+		atomic_inc(&i915->gt.active_requests); /* don't requeue idle */

atomic_inc_not_zero?

switch_to_kernel_context_sync(i915, i915->gt.active_engines); - if (!--i915->gt.active_requests) {
+		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&i915->gt.active_requests)) {
  			__i915_gem_park(i915);
  			rearm_hangcheck = false;
  		}
  	}
-
+	mutex_unlock(&i915->gt.active_mutex);
  	mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
out_rearm:
@@ -137,26 +139,16 @@ static void idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
void i915_gem_park(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  {
-	GEM_TRACE("\n");
-
-	lockdep_assert_held(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(i915->gt.active_requests);
-
-	if (!i915->gt.awake)
-		return;
-
  	/* Defer the actual call to __i915_gem_park() to prevent ping-pongs */
-	mod_delayed_work(i915->wq, &i915->gt.idle_work, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests));
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&i915->gt.active_requests))
+		mod_delayed_work(i915->wq,
+				 &i915->gt.idle_work,
+				 msecs_to_jiffies(100));
  }
-void i915_gem_unpark(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+static void __i915_gem_unpark(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  {
-	GEM_TRACE("\n");
-
-	lockdep_assert_held(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915->gt.active_requests);
-	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(i915);
-
  	if (i915->gt.awake)
  		return;
@@ -191,11 +183,29 @@ void i915_gem_unpark(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  			   round_jiffies_up_relative(HZ));
  }
+void i915_gem_unpark(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+	if (atomic_add_unless(&i915->gt.active_requests, 1, 0))
+		return;

This looks wrong - how can it be okay to maybe not increment active_requests on unpark? What am I missing?

I would expect here you would need "atomic_inc_and_return_true_if_OLD_value_was_zero" but I don't think there is such API.

+
+	mutex_lock(&i915->gt.active_mutex);
+	if (!atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests)) {
+		GEM_TRACE("\n");
+		__i915_gem_unpark(i915);
+		smp_mb__before_atomic();

Why is this needed? I have no idea.. but I think we want comments with all memory barriers.

+	}
+	atomic_inc(&i915->gt.active_requests);
+	mutex_unlock(&i915->gt.active_mutex);
+}
+
  bool i915_gem_load_power_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  {
+	mutex_lock(&i915->gt.active_mutex);
+	atomic_inc(&i915->gt.active_requests);

Why this function has to manually manage active_requests? Can it be written in a simpler way?

+
  	/* Force loading the kernel context on all engines */
  	if (!switch_to_kernel_context_sync(i915, ALL_ENGINES))
-		return false;
+		goto err_active;
/*
  	 * Immediately park the GPU so that we enable powersaving and
@@ -203,9 +213,20 @@ bool i915_gem_load_power_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  	 * unpark and start using the engine->pinned_default_state, otherwise
  	 * it is in limbo and an early reset may fail.
  	 */
+
+	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&i915->gt.active_requests))
+		goto err_unlock;
+
  	__i915_gem_park(i915);
+	mutex_unlock(&i915->gt.active_mutex);
return true;
+
+err_active:
+	atomic_dec(&i915->gt.active_requests);
+err_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&i915->gt.active_mutex);
+	return false;
  }
void i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
@@ -337,5 +358,6 @@ void i915_gem_resume(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
void i915_gem_init__pm(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  {
+	mutex_init(&i915->gt.active_mutex);
  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&i915->gt.idle_work, idle_work_handler);
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index e9c2094ab8ea..8d396f3c747d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include "i915_drv.h"
  #include "i915_active.h"
+#include "i915_gem_pm.h" /* XXX layering violation! */
  #include "i915_globals.h"
  #include "i915_reset.h"
@@ -130,19 +131,6 @@ i915_request_remove_from_client(struct i915_request *request)
  	spin_unlock(&file_priv->mm.lock);
  }
-static void reserve_gt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
-{
-	if (!i915->gt.active_requests++)
-		i915_gem_unpark(i915);
-}
-
-static void unreserve_gt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
-{
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915->gt.active_requests);
-	if (!--i915->gt.active_requests)
-		i915_gem_park(i915);
-}
-
  static void advance_ring(struct i915_request *request)
  {
  	struct intel_ring *ring = request->ring;
@@ -304,7 +292,7 @@ static void i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *request)
__retire_engine_upto(request->engine, request); - unreserve_gt(request->i915);
+	i915_gem_park(request->i915);
i915_sched_node_fini(&request->sched);
  	i915_request_put(request);
@@ -607,8 +595,6 @@ i915_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
  	u32 seqno;
  	int ret;
- lockdep_assert_held(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
-
  	/*
  	 * Preempt contexts are reserved for exclusive use to inject a
  	 * preemption context switch. They are never to be used for any trivial
@@ -633,7 +619,7 @@ i915_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
  	if (IS_ERR(ce))
  		return ERR_CAST(ce);
- reserve_gt(i915);
+	i915_gem_unpark(i915);
  	mutex_lock(&ce->ring->timeline->mutex);
/* Move our oldest request to the slab-cache (if not in use!) */
@@ -766,7 +752,7 @@ i915_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
  	kmem_cache_free(global.slab_requests, rq);
  err_unreserve:
  	mutex_unlock(&ce->ring->timeline->mutex);
-	unreserve_gt(i915);
+	i915_gem_park(i915);
  	intel_context_unpin(ce);
  	return ERR_PTR(ret);
  }
@@ -1356,7 +1342,7 @@ void i915_retire_requests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
lockdep_assert_held(&i915->drm.struct_mutex); - if (!i915->gt.active_requests)
+	if (!atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests))
  		return;
list_for_each_entry_safe(ring, tmp,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
index 45f73b8b4e6d..6ce366091e0b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -1646,9 +1646,9 @@ static int __igt_switch_to_kernel_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
  				return err;
  		}
- if (i915->gt.active_requests) {
+		if (atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests)) {
  			pr_err("%d active requests remain after switching to kernel context, pass %d (%s) on %s engine%s\n",
-			       i915->gt.active_requests,
+			       atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests),
  			       pass, from_idle ? "idle" : "busy",
  			       __engine_name(i915, engines),
  			       is_power_of_2(engines) ? "" : "s");
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
index 971148fbe6f5..c2b08fdf23cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -506,12 +506,7 @@ static void disable_retire_worker(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  	i915_gem_shrinker_unregister(i915);
mutex_lock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
-	if (!i915->gt.active_requests++) {
-		intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
-
-		with_intel_runtime_pm(i915, wakeref)
-			i915_gem_unpark(i915);
-	}
+	i915_gem_unpark(i915);
  	mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&i915->gt.retire_work);
@@ -616,10 +611,10 @@ static int igt_mmap_offset_exhaustion(void *arg)
  	drm_mm_remove_node(&resv);
  out_park:
  	mutex_lock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
-	if (--i915->gt.active_requests)
-		queue_delayed_work(i915->wq, &i915->gt.retire_work, 0);
-	else
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&i915->gt.active_requests))
  		queue_delayed_work(i915->wq, &i915->gt.idle_work, 0);
+	else
+		queue_delayed_work(i915->wq, &i915->gt.retire_work, 0);
  	mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
  	i915_gem_shrinker_register(i915);
  	return err;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
index 60bbf8b4df40..7afc5ee8dda5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ void mock_device_flush(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
  		mock_engine_flush(engine);
i915_retire_requests(i915);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(i915->gt.active_requests);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&i915->gt.active_requests));
  }
static void mock_device_release(struct drm_device *dev)
@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private *mock_gem_device(void)
i915_timelines_init(i915); + mutex_init(&i915->gt.active_mutex);
  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&i915->gt.active_rings);
  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&i915->gt.closed_vma);

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux