Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2019-03-27 04:59:04)
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-intel tree, today's linux-next build (i386
> defconfig) failed like this:
We had a CI reporting mishap, where a failed 32-bit build resulted in
a misleading success e-mail being sent.
The tree is now fixed and we'll investigate the problem to avoid such
a false report in the future.
Regards, Joonas
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h:28:0,
> from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h:27,
> from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c:25:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h: In function '__raw_uncore_read64':
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:257:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readl'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> return read##s__(uncore->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg)); \
> ^
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:269:1: note: in expansion of macro '__raw_read'
> __raw_read(64, q)
> ^~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h: In function '__raw_uncore_write64':
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:264:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writel'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> write##s__(val, uncore->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg)); \
> ^
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro '__raw_write'
> __raw_write(64, q)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 6cc5ca768825 ("drm/i915: rename raw reg access functions")
>
> I have reverted that commit and the following ones in the tree up to
>
> 9511cb6481af ("drm/i915: Adding missing '; ' to ENGINE_INSTANCES")
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
