Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Mark AML 0x87CA as ULX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 22:49 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> If I'm reading the spec right AML 0x87CA is a Y SKU, so it
> should be marked as ULX in our old style terminology.

You are right, only the CPU is based on CFL.

Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>

> 
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: c0c46ca461f1 ("drm/i915/aml: Add new Amber Lake PCI ID")
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index f723b15527f8..428279fd88a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2361,7 +2361,8 @@ static inline unsigned int
> i915_sg_segment_size(void)
>  				 INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x5915 || \
>  				 INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x591E)
>  #define IS_AML_ULX(dev_priv)	(INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x591C || \
> -				 INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x87C0)
> +				 INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x87C0 || \
> +				 INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x87CA)
>  #define IS_SKL_GT2(dev_priv)	(IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && \
>  				 INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gt == 2)
>  #define IS_SKL_GT3(dev_priv)	(IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && \

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux