The invalid set/get tests do not serve the purpose of detecting whether
or not invalid parameters are indeed detect correctly -- simply because
the kernel is the arbiter of what is invalid and this test second
guesses that and is wrong.
The intent of this test was to ensure that we didn't include any holes
in the parameter space that may have been used for nefarious undisclosed
purposes, i.e. the maintainer's job backed up by reviewers.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/i915/gem_ctx_param.c | 16 ----------------
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_param.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_param.c
index acc1e6297..b3f8637df 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_param.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_param.c
@@ -296,22 +296,6 @@ igt_main
/* I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_SSEU tests are located in gem_ctx_sseu.c */
- /* NOTE: This testcase intentionally tests for the next free parameter
- * to catch ABI extensions. Don't "fix" this testcase without adding all
- * the tests for the new param first.
- */
- arg.param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_SSEU + 1;
-
- igt_subtest("invalid-param-get") {
- arg.ctx_id = ctx;
- igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_get_param(fd, &arg), -EINVAL);
- }
-
- igt_subtest("invalid-param-set") {
- arg.ctx_id = ctx;
- igt_assert_eq(__gem_context_set_param(fd, &arg), -EINVAL);
- }
-
igt_fixture
close(fd);
}
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
