Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Don't try to evaluate whether reads executed on an absent ring do
> anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_mocs_settings.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_mocs_settings.c b/tests/i915/gem_mocs_settings.c
> index 21f7c6e12..1a311b8c0 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_mocs_settings.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_mocs_settings.c
> @@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ igt_main
> }
> }
>
> - igt_subtest_f("mocs-isolation-%s",
> - e->name) {
> + igt_subtest_f("mocs-isolation-%s", e->name) {
> + gem_require_ring(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags);
> gem_require_contexts(fd);
>
> isolation_test(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
