On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:19 PM Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2019-03-15 00:13:31) > > With Elkhart Lake being added to the platforms we are almost on the edge > > of platforms that fits on this 32 bits mask. So bump it to 64 bits to > > have room for new ones. > > > > Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> > > Since platform_mask exists as an optimisation for code size, it'll be > useful to track the impact of changes. code size? Moving to u64 for this mask would make almost no difference. Just checking here: $ size drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.o* text data bss dec hex filename 1836757 40454 4176 1881387 1cb52b drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.o 1836533 40454 4176 1881163 1cb44b drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.o.old So... around 200 bytes. Lucas De Marchi > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Lucas De Marchi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
