On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:23:20PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2019-03-08 21:42:58)
> > This exactly same approach was already used from gen9
> > to gen10 and from gen10 to gen11. Let's also use it
> > for gen11+.
> >
> > Let's first assume that we inherit a similar platform
> > and than we apply the differences on top.
> >
> > Different from the previous attempts this will be
> > done this time with coccinelle. We obviously need to
> > exclude some case that is really exclusive for gen11
> > like PCH, Firmware, and few others. Luckly this was
> > easy to filter by selecting the files we are touching
> > with coccinelle as exposed below:
> >
> > spatch -sp_file gen11\+.cocci --in-place i915_perf.c \
> > intel_bios.c intel_cdclk.c intel_ddi.c \
> > intel_device_info.c intel_display.c intel_dpll_mgr.c \
> > intel_dsi_vbt.c intel_hdmi.c intel_mocs.c intel_color.c
> >
> > @noticelake@ expression e; @@
> > -!IS_ICELAKE(e)
> > +INTEL_GEN(e) < 11
> > @notgen11@ expression e; @@
> > -!IS_GEN(e, 11)
> > +INTEL_GEN(e) < 11
> > @icelake@ expression e; @@
> > -IS_ICELAKE(e)
> > +INTEL_GEN(e) >= 11
> > @gen11@ expression e; @@
> > -IS_GEN(e, 11)
> > +INTEL_GEN(e) >= 11
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > v2: Remove intel_lrc.c per Tvrtko request since those were w/a
> > for ICL hw issuea and media related configuration.
> >
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 6 +++---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 6 +++---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_mocs.c | 2 +-
> > 11 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> > index e19a89e4df64..9b0292a38865 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> > @@ -2881,7 +2881,7 @@ void i915_perf_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >
> > sysfs_attr_init(&dev_priv->perf.oa.test_config.sysfs_metric_id.attr);
> >
> > - if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> > i915_perf_load_test_config_icl(dev_priv);
> > } else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > i915_perf_load_test_config_cnl(dev_priv);
>
> Given that every platform so far has had different oa configurations,
> that looks to be a hasty assumption that future platforms will be fixed.
I know... But my hope is that at some point it gets stabilized.
Well, or at least start with this so any other gen11 could reuse and
gen12 would start with that and change later for >= gen12 and on...
> -Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
