Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-03-05 14:47:51) > > On 02/03/2019 10:06, Chris Wilson wrote: > > As we allow per-context engine allows the legacy concept of > > I915_EXEC_RING no longer applies universally. We are still exposing the > > unrelated exec-id in GEM_BUSY, so transition this ioctl (once more > > slightly changing its ABI, but no one cares) over to only reporting the > > uabi-class (not instance as we can not foreseeably fit those into the > > small bitmask). > > > > The only user of the extended ring information from GEM_BUSY is ddx/sna, > > which tries to use the non-rcs business information to guide which > > engine to use for subsequent operations on foreign bo. All that matters > > for it is the decision between rcs and !rcs, so it is unaffected by the > > change in higher bits. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> I need a corresponding ack on https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/57457/ -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
