Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-03-04 16:26:56) > > On 04/03/2019 11:41, Chris Wilson wrote: > > We may race the interrupt signaling with retirement, in which case the > > order in which we acquire the reference inside the interrupt is vital to > > provide the correct barrier against the request being freed in > > retirement, i.e. we need to acquire our reference before marking the > > breadcrumb as cancelled (as soon as the breadcrumb is cancelled > > retirement may drop its reference to the request without serialisation > > with the interrupt handler). [snip] > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Ta. The scary thought is that the bugs will only get more subtle! -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx