Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915: introduce REG_BIT() and REG_GENMASK() to define register contents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:12:43 +0100, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

But I think the central tenant is that we want to use the common naming
scheme so that we can trivially go from GENMASK to REG_GENMASK/GENMASK32
and that other people reading our code already know the language (plus
we want these to be part of include/linux and out of our hair!)

That's valid point.

Thanks,
Michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux