Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/edid: If no preferred mode is found assume the first mode is preferred

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:23:01PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 19:14 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Some monitors apparently forget to mark any mode as preferred in the
> > EDID. In this particular case we have a very generic looking ID
> > "PNP Model 0 Serial Number 4" / "LVDS 800x600" so a specific quirk
> > doesn't seem particularly wise. Also the quirk we have
> > (EDID_QUIRK_FIRST_DETAILED_PREFERRED) is actually defunct so we'd
> > have to fix it first.
> >
> > As a generic fallback let's just mark the first probed mode (which
> > should be the first detailed mode, assuming there are any) as
> > preferred.
> 
> What problem is this trying to fix? Userspace (and drm for that matter)
> is typically going to pick the first mode in the list anyway if there's
> none marked as preferred. Not having any preferred modes was pretty
> common on CRTs IIRC.

Ah sorry, I forgot to mention the original symptoms. The problem is
that with no preferred mode i915 decided to get the fixed mode for
the panel from the VBT instead. That one turned out to be 1024x768
which made the 800x600 panel somewhat unhappy.

So instead of putting this logic into the EDID parser I guess we
could just put it into the i915 fixed mode code. But then I suppose
we should also fix EDID_QUIRK_FIRST_DETAILED_PREFERRED (assuming it
exists for a good reason).

> 
> The other major case I've seen of a monitor with no preferred mode are
> the early dual-link DVI displays without internal scalers (Apple
> Cinema, Dell 3007WFP, etc). You end up with 1280x800 first in the list
> since 2560x1600 doesn't fit in a single DVI link. It might be nice if
> such monitors decided their preferred mode based on the link
> capabilities; if you know it's a dual-link capable port, you'd probably
> prefer 2560x1600.
> 
> Does it make more sense to run the "infer a preferred mode" logic after
> we've done mode validation for the output?

For this particular case that wouldn't help since then we'd end up
picking the 800x600 75Hz EST mode. Well, I'm not sure whether the
panel would like that or not. The VBIOS at least selects the 800x600
60Hz EST mode for whatever reason.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux