Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_schedule: Rebuild signal handler in child

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2019-02-08 08:59:53)
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-02-07 23:03:08)
> > Make sure that the SIGARLM handler is captured so that we don't
> > accidentally shoot ourselves in the foot instead of merely waking up the
> > execbuf.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Warming up the context ahead of time is reasonable for super low SKUs.
> 
> But the SIGALRM handler should be inherted, so that's a red herring.

It wasn't.

	child 0 died with signal 14, Alarm clock

-> hit SIG_DFL
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux